Zenrider13 October 2012 at 11:40pmPosts: 3545 (0 today)Status: offline
Progressive jen15 October 2012 at 3:04amPosts: 5472 (0 today)Status: offline
Jimmy seemed a bit scattered during the interview. Maybe he's a PG fan and was nervous?
tk1315 October 2012 at 5:07amPosts: 18 (0 today)Status: offline
Jimmy Fallon is actually pretty talented. He does some great impressions of famous music stars.
He doesn't even do his Jim Morrison there... you should look that one up, it's frighteningly good.
Page15 October 2012 at 5:41amPosts: 814 (0 today)Status: offline
Amazinly disappointed with Fallon's juvenile handling of the interveiw. He's done much, much better with others. PG did well, of course.
Pat Parker20 October 2012 at 2:32amPosts: 2683 (0 today)Status: offline
I am happy to read elsewhere on Facebook that so many people felt the same way as I did .... Jimmy Fallon did a terrible job and wasted a great opportunity to speak with pg ... Many folks really slammed jimmy f for the piss-poor job and I agree with them. However I put it off to jimmy being very nervous, star struck and just plain old wired, a shame really.
One positive point ... There was someone more uncomfortable than pg in the interview for a change
sapling20 October 2012 at 3:29amPosts: 894 (0 today)Status: offline
We were giggling through the whole thing... someone said he seemed more nervous and excited with Peter than with Salma Hayek undressing him. We all burst into to fits of laughter at his singing but it was soo cute. He really seemed a star struck fan not an interveiwer. The look on Peter's face a few times 'priceless'!
I was waiting for him to lean over and lick peter's face...I'm sure I would have.
Pat Parker20 October 2012 at 3:31pmPosts: 2683 (0 today)Status: offline
Bumping to the top just to get rid of the 10 threads with the same topic.